They all got on my bad side at some point, and I blogged about it (buy.com, 24 hour fitness, msn messenger, q-cup). No big deal I thought, but then I noticed something interesting: I was getting a lot of comments on those posts, and I kept getting them, even entries that were almost 2 years old.
So I looked at my referrer logs in StatCounter (a basic, but free web metrics service) and saw that a lot of people were getting to my blog from Google searches. Actually, 90% of my web traffic was coming from Google searches, so I did some investigation and here’ s what I found:
Whoa. Top placement on a Google search. That would explain why I’ve got 85 responses to my buy.com sucks entry. Check it out.
Turns out, I must have a bit of Google juice becuase I’ve got top placement for “24 hour fitness membership deals” and “MSN messenger memory leak” as well…
And my tirade against Q-cup a few weeks ago is on the first Google result page for “q-cup cupertino” as well. Not top placement, but not bad 
Something tells me these companies aren’t using blog search tools…
March 17, 2007 at 8:47 pm
This article came from a Lunch 2.0 discussion. Here is Jeremiah’s take.
March 18, 2007 at 7:49 am
stop whining, mark
good seeing you in atx! come back and visit soon (next wedding, i suppose)
April 11, 2007 at 12:51 pm
[...] already going in the right direction and really on the ball about learning more; I know a few other companies that might benefit from their [...]
September 20, 2008 at 2:37 am
cialis for sale sale cheap cialis